But if you use fiefdoms then you're not using ether aegon's garden or seat of power. Or you have 9 limited.
Ditching the gardens is tine by me.
But if you use fiefdoms then you're not using ether aegon's garden or seat of power. Or you have 9 limited.
I tried this. Those were the first characters to get knelt by my Lanni opponent.I keep looking at Noble Cause and thinking that deadly is going to be a key aspect of decks that want to take advantage of it. If your opponent lets challenges go unopposed because of the deadly, you gain more power, which plays into the strength and goal of the deck. If your opponent blocks to deny you power, then they lose a character and you're able to gain card and resource advantage to help minimize the disadvantage of the agenda. So, of course, the Brightwater Man-At-Arms looks good for this strategy, but also, this makes Ghost of Winterfell and Ser Imry Florent awfully tempting to me. As well, if you're going the Asshai direction, Black Amethysts seems like a good candidate.
Again, I do not feel like this is the decks fault simply because most decks would struggle against turn 1 4 claim.
I play melee 90% of the time, so I would be able to play both of those plots.I really think that if you're going with a restricted plot, Negotiations is probably better to refill your hand if you start to sputter out. The claim 2 isn't shabby either. One plot that I've been looking at is Attack from the Sea. 4/5/1 is always a solid set of stats, and while it might knock out a couple of your locations for a turn (thankfully not Seat of Power or Narrow Sea) it can really wreck a control deck these days.
Quite welcome! I keep thinking that our best ways to mitigate the impact of control decks will be through plots. The tricky part is that some of our best rush pieces (Power of Faith) are also plots, which provides limited slots and means that we can use both on the same turn.