Jump to content

Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

A Game of Thrones 2nd Edition


Search for Cards
Text:
Order By:
More Search Options
Type:
Faction:
Set:

Unique:
Loyalty:
Restricted:
Cost:
Strength:
Icons:
Reserve:
Income:
Initiative:
Claim:
Hide Search Options
Recent Card Discussion
Ser Davos Seaworth
-----

Jul 27 2021 03:26 PM by BaraBob

No, if he cannot be killed he cannot be chosen as the target to satisfy the claim of a military challenge

Ser Davos Seaworth
-----

Mar 17 2021 01:04 AM by Casvian

Doe this means that when you lose a military challenge, you can still choose Davos as the claim but he won't die? That would be pretty broken against military focused decks.

Catelyn Stark
****-

Apr 18 2020 10:45 PM by daviduk2000

If you save a character using a dupe or any other method. Then a character didn't die. so there is nothing for Cat to react to.

And yes there is nothing about cat that cares about how the character is killed of sacrificed. kill most of your board with wildfire if you like

Catelyn Stark
****-

Apr 12 2020 08:17 AM by Elbslayer

will the power gaining of cat also trigger when a copy/duplicate of a unique card gets removed? or is the save preventing a death?

Catelyn Stark
****-

Apr 12 2020 08:08 AM by Elbslayer

can you use greywinds killing action and kill your own characters to trigger cats power gaining?

Beyond Reproach
-----

Oct 18 2019 03:28 PM by jumbles

It's the second option: all characters not under your control. If it was a specific character the card would have had the word "choose" and/or "target."

Beyond Reproach
-----

Oct 18 2019 07:01 AM by forel

Hi. Does it mean that every player must sacrifice the attachments they put on ONE specific ennemy character, or that all the attachments that are put on all the ennemy characters must go?

“A Cask of Ale”
*----

Jun 28 2019 02:54 PM by Lykle

That I understand, it just feels awfully wrong. Thanks.

 

Yes.

 

"A player’s revealed plot card is considered in play and interacts with the game state" (RRp15).

"Cards by default enter play under their owner’s control. Some abilities may cause cards to change control during a game" (RRp14).

“A Cask of Ale”
*----

Jun 25 2019 08:51 PM by jumbles

Yes.

 

"A player’s revealed plot card is considered in play and interacts with the game state" (RRp15).

"Cards by default enter play under their owner’s control. Some abilities may cause cards to change control during a game" (RRp14).

“A Cask of Ale”
*----

Jun 25 2019 01:25 PM by Lykle

Does this include plot cards?

Owen the Oaf
*****

Jun 19 2019 11:19 PM by ArinRahl

Well thank you, Lannister-Rains-Killer!

The Prince that was Promised
****-

Jun 09 2019 08:05 PM by Palpa

Ok. Not sure if that is what the designers had in mind but its what his text says. Thanks

The Prince that was Promised
****-

Jun 08 2019 10:01 PM by Odrl

On theirinthrone, Rickon can cancel the reaction, even if you choose to stand and draw and NOT search. Is this correct?

 

Yes. The ability still has the word "search" in it, so it can be cancelled by Rickon regardless of which option the player intends to choose.

The Prince that was Promised
****-

Jun 08 2019 03:03 PM by Palpa

On theirinthrone, Rickon can cancel the reaction, even if you choose to stand and draw and NOT search. Is this correct?

Ser Robert Strong
-----

May 19 2019 12:00 PM by jumbles

Yes, they can be used in the same deck since no rule or text forbids it.

Ser Robert Strong
-----

May 18 2019 03:31 PM by Elbslayer

would it be allowed to have ser gregor clegane and ser robert strong in the same deck? storywise they resemble the same person in different "condition" but rulewise they don't represent the same card.

Northern Armory
-----

May 09 2019 08:54 PM by jumbles

That is correct, unless you have a way to remove it from play and then put it back in play.

Northern Armory
-----

May 09 2019 08:34 PM by Elbslayer

so is the "stand a stark char" actually a 1 time effect only since the armory is not to be allowed to stand again?

Raiding Khalasar
-----

Apr 29 2019 10:15 AM by jumbles

That would be correct if you also had an attacking Bloodrider.

Raiding Khalasar
-----

Apr 28 2019 10:10 PM by hypernexus

If a player has multiple Raiding Khalasar's in one challenge, does each of them raise the claim value by 1?

Example:
Plot claim :1

2 Raiding Khalasars: 2

Raised claim : 3

The Spider’s Web
*****

Apr 25 2019 10:19 AM by jumbles

You would be able to do three.

The Spider’s Web
*****

Apr 23 2019 09:15 AM by Aniel

Hi, could someone clarify for me, if I would use this scheme in RAINS, together with Casterly Rock will I be able to play 3 INT challenges (+1 from Casterly Rock; +1 from the Spider's Web) or still only two? 

Castle Black
*****

Apr 23 2019 12:52 AM by jumbles

You don't bring the character out of the challenge. You just stand him and add 2 Str. A character usually has to kneel to join a challenge, but remaining kneeling is not a requirement of participating in a challenge a character has already joined.

Blood of the Dragon
****-

Apr 23 2019 12:50 AM by jumbles

It lasts through all phases. It is a constant ability.

Castle Black
*****

Apr 23 2019 12:09 AM by bueneira
No, he don't left the challenge. You declare him as defender (must kneel), then you can use Castle Black after he is already at the challenge as a defender. He will than stand and get the bonus, but stays in the challenge. He will be able to contribuite in this challenge with +2 STR and still be used after the challenge (because you stand him).