Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
A Game of Thrones 2nd Edition
Search for Cards | ||
Recent Card Discussion | ||
Ser Davos Seaworth
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mar 17 2021 01:04 AM by Casvian Doe this means that when you lose a military challenge, you can still choose Davos as the claim but he won't die? That would be pretty broken against military focused decks.
Catelyn Stark
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Apr 18 2020 10:45 PM by daviduk2000 If you save a character using a dupe or any other method. Then a character didn't die. so there is nothing for Cat to react to. And yes there is nothing about cat that cares about how the character is killed of sacrificed. kill most of your board with wildfire if you like
Catelyn Stark
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Apr 12 2020 08:17 AM by Elbslayer will the power gaining of cat also trigger when a copy/duplicate of a unique card gets removed? or is the save preventing a death?
Catelyn Stark
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Apr 12 2020 08:08 AM by Elbslayer can you use greywinds killing action and kill your own characters to trigger cats power gaining?
Beyond Reproach
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Oct 18 2019 03:28 PM by jumbles It's the second option: all characters not under your control. If it was a specific character the card would have had the word "choose" and/or "target."
Beyond Reproach
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Oct 18 2019 07:01 AM by forel Hi. Does it mean that every player must sacrifice the attachments they put on ONE specific ennemy character, or that all the attachments that are put on all the ennemy characters must go?
“A Cask of Aleâ€
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Jun 28 2019 02:54 PM by Lykle That I understand, it just feels awfully wrong. Thanks.
“A Cask of Aleâ€
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Jun 25 2019 08:51 PM by jumbles Yes.
"A player’s revealed plot card is considered in play and interacts with the game state" (RRp15). "Cards by default enter play under their owner’s control. Some abilities may cause cards to change control during a game" (RRp14).
The Prince that was Promised
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Jun 09 2019 08:05 PM by Palpa Ok. Not sure if that is what the designers had in mind but its what his text says. Thanks
The Prince that was Promised
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Jun 08 2019 10:01 PM by Odrl
Yes. The ability still has the word "search" in it, so it can be cancelled by Rickon regardless of which option the player intends to choose.
The Prince that was Promised
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Jun 08 2019 03:03 PM by Palpa On theirinthrone, Rickon can cancel the reaction, even if you choose to stand and draw and NOT search. Is this correct?
Ser Robert Strong
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() May 19 2019 12:00 PM by jumbles Yes, they can be used in the same deck since no rule or text forbids it.
Ser Robert Strong
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() May 18 2019 03:31 PM by Elbslayer would it be allowed to have ser gregor clegane and ser robert strong in the same deck? storywise they resemble the same person in different "condition" but rulewise they don't represent the same card.
Northern Armory
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() May 09 2019 08:54 PM by jumbles That is correct, unless you have a way to remove it from play and then put it back in play.
Northern Armory
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() May 09 2019 08:34 PM by Elbslayer so is the "stand a stark char" actually a 1 time effect only since the armory is not to be allowed to stand again?
Raiding Khalasar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Apr 29 2019 10:15 AM by jumbles That would be correct if you also had an attacking Bloodrider.
Raiding Khalasar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Apr 28 2019 10:10 PM by hypernexus If a player has multiple Raiding Khalasar's in one challenge, does each of them raise the claim value by 1? Example: 2 Raiding Khalasars: 2 Raised claim : 3
The Spider’s Web
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Apr 23 2019 09:15 AM by Aniel Hi, could someone clarify for me, if I would use this scheme in RAINS, together with Casterly Rock will I be able to play 3 INT challenges (+1 from Casterly Rock; +1 from the Spider's Web) or still only two?
Castle Black
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Apr 23 2019 12:52 AM by jumbles You don't bring the character out of the challenge. You just stand him and add 2 Str. A character usually has to kneel to join a challenge, but remaining kneeling is not a requirement of participating in a challenge a character has already joined.
Blood of the Dragon
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Apr 23 2019 12:50 AM by jumbles It lasts through all phases. It is a constant ability.
Castle Black
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Apr 23 2019 12:09 AM by bueneira No, he don't left the challenge. You declare him as defender (must kneel), then you can use Castle Black after he is already at the challenge as a defender. He will than stand and get the bonus, but stays in the challenge. He will be able to contribuite in this challenge with +2 STR and still be used after the challenge (because you stand him). |
Browse Full Sets | ||
![]() |
Core Set |
219 Cards |
![]() |
Intro Decks |
0 Cards |
![]() |
Westeros Cycle |
100 Cards |
![]() |
Wolves of the North |
52 Cards |
![]() |
War of Five Kings Cycle |
120 Cards |
![]() |
Lions of Casterly Rock |
52 Cards |
![]() |
Blood and Gold Cycle |
120 Cards |
![]() |
Watchers on the Wall |
52 Cards |
![]() |
House of Thorns |
52 Cards |
![]() |
Flight of Crows Cycle |
120 Cards |
![]() |
Sands of Dorne |
52 Cards |
![]() |
Dance of Shadows Cycle |
120 Cards |
![]() |
Kings of the Isles |
52 Cards |
![]() |
King's Landing Cycle |
120 Cards |
![]() |
Fury of the Storm |
52 Cards |
![]() |
Dragons of the East |
52 Cards |
![]() |
The Things We Do for Love |
36 Cards |
Jul 27 2021 03:26 PM by BaraBob
No, if he cannot be killed he cannot be chosen as the target to satisfy the claim of a military challenge