Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Conquest - What we know, what we suspect.
#41
Posted 19 March 2014 - 06:05 PM

Now I'm trying to figure out how they could be indicating shields. Maybe that's those pips on the left of "The Fury of Sicarius" and "Tallassarian Tempest Blade" (in Sicarius's Command Squad). That probably makes the most sense, I'm thinking.
#42
Posted 19 March 2014 - 06:05 PM


https://twitter.com/imboardgames
- Toqtamish and MotoBuzzsawMF like this
#43
Posted 19 March 2014 - 06:59 PM

#44
Posted 19 March 2014 - 07:28 PM

#45
Posted 19 March 2014 - 09:10 PM

#46
Posted 19 March 2014 - 09:25 PM

#47
Posted 19 March 2014 - 10:48 PM

#48
Posted 20 March 2014 - 02:06 AM

Added : The suspected "shield Icon"
Added : Minimum Deck Size
Added : Info about the hidden warlord deployment step using the Servo Skull
Change : Stuff about the golden hammer. I agree it needs no value as BD Flory put forward in this thread.
#49
Posted 20 March 2014 - 01:57 PM

I'm not sure about the Skulls=Shields, partly I guess because a skull is approximately the opposite of a shield thematically. However, SOMETHING is the shield icon and I'm not sure we've seen another better candidate.
If this was Star Wars they'd look a lot like Edge icons, but I guess that's just graphic layout similarities...
- LesterCrow likes this
#50
Posted 20 March 2014 - 03:10 PM


I have no idea what the skulls on the ultramarines warlord squad mean. They do not look like Space Marine versions of this same icon as they are in a different place. Still the two marines on the right both have the same little yellow icon as the above card.

#51
Posted 20 March 2014 - 03:30 PM

Also since the Eldar signature squad has a unit named Starbane's Council I think we know who the Eldar Warlord will be, Eldorath Starbane. http://wh40k.lexican...dorath_Starbane
Chaos Warlord is likely named Zarathur, as if you right click his image on this page: http://fantasyflight...s.asp?eidn=4704 which is right beside Cato it says the image is "art-zarathur.png"
Imperial Guard Warlord appears to be Colonel Straken, his artwork is on this page: http://www.fantasyfl...eidm=261&esem=1 down beside Nazdreg and is called "-art-colonelstraken.png" Colonel Straken is a known character, http://wh40k.lexican...om/wiki/Straken
So that makes it:
SM: Cato
Orks: Nazdreg
Eldar: Eldorath Starbane
IG: Colonel Straken
Chaos: Zarathur
Just leaves DE and Tau as unknown/unseen right now.
#52
Posted 20 March 2014 - 03:38 PM

Also since the Eldar signature squad has a unit named Starbane's Council I think we know who the Eldar Warlord will be, Eldorath Starbane. http://wh40k.lexican...dorath_Starbane
could very well be.. though I was was FFG I would be avoiding Necron stories or face the wrath of "missing faction: threads!
#53
Posted 20 March 2014 - 04:00 PM

the squad cards have their own numbers out of 9 to the right of the text box. So I would say that it would be a duplication of information to have that and the yellow icon... duplication of information is usually the thing they avoid in card design. That elf for example is 5/9 in the squad and card 6 in the entire core set.. (so it seams)
He's card 123 in the core set, it's down in the bottom right corner by the set logo, a black hammer in a white circle. Pretty much the same as every other LCG. It's on every card. The 6 is probably his set # like in Star Wars objective sets each Warlord has their own unique set number which seems to follow the alignment wheel counter clockwise as Cato is 001, Nazdreg is 003, Eldorath(?) 006. The Warlords also look like they are the first 7 cards in the set as their card number matches their set numbers.
#54
Posted 20 March 2014 - 04:05 PM

#55
Posted 20 March 2014 - 04:23 PM

#56
Posted 20 March 2014 - 04:33 PM

could very well be.. though I was was FFG I would be avoiding Necron stories or face the wrath of "missing faction: threads!
There will be plenty of those regardless.
I do really like the concept of having a Warlord who is not only an Identity card (as in Netrunner) but also brings their private cadre of thematic (and hopefully synergistic) cards. This means that each new Warlord should offer a greater impact on the game and really have a lot of influence over how the deck plays.
I wonder if any of the Warlord-buddy cards will also be normal cards and if so, whether that would allow you to exceed the normal 3x deck limit?
#57
Posted 20 March 2014 - 05:16 PM

could very well be.. though I was was FFG I would be avoiding Necron stories or face the wrath of "missing faction: threads!
Could also be a hint of things to come maybe since really that is what Starbane is (in)famous for.
#58
Posted 20 March 2014 - 05:38 PM

On a side note. Card types seem to be: Army, Attachment, Warlord, Event, Support.
#59
Posted 20 March 2014 - 05:53 PM

IMO, Shield is a keyword. Look at the Tempest Blade, it says "...gets +1 ATK and gains...," then it has a description of what Shield means. That's a pretty clear sign that Shield is a keyword, and not an icon. Especially since the Tempest Blade is an attachment, or are you saying that attachments can have Shields too? Also, I believe The Fury of Sicarius is an Event.
If you look at some of the other pictures, you'll see that some cards have a blue icon there instead of a yellow icon, and some cards have nothing.
If they are like Force Icons then yes attachments could have shields too.
Maybe the blue is the loyal cards mentioned in the deck building section and the yellow is the signature cards for each Warlord ? So far all the Yellow symbols have been on Warlord set cards.
#60
Posted 20 March 2014 - 05:58 PM

- mnBroncos and MotoBuzzsawMF like this