Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
August Lindquist
Submitted
Guest
, -- | Last updated --
![]() August LindquistElegant and Elusive Type: Character Faction: Silver Twilight Cost: 3 Skill: 3 Icons: (C) (A) (I) Game Text: Government. Lodge. Willpower. Fated 3. August Lindquist cannot have Relic cards attached to him. Disrupt: If August Lindquist would be wounded, instead choose another character to be wounded. Then, place a success token on August Lindquist. Set: For the Greater Good Number: 49 Illustrator: |
Call of Cthulhu: The Card Game, Living Card Game, the Living Card Game logo, Fantasy Flight Games, and the FFG logo are trademarks of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.
17 Comments
Great anti khopesh card.
Simply WOW!
Can't be stolen by Stygian Eye either, amongst other Relic shenanigans.
Finally a reason to use Infernal Obession over Stygian Eye ;-)
TBH; I'm not sure how useful his ability will be, though. Your opponent just won't target him with any wounding effects, and desctruction/sacrifice/remove from play also seem more dominant currently (unless the Agency box will reverse that trend). So, the only potential benefit I see is from losing combat struggles...
True, I don't see it as an anti-card for targeted wounding (like khopesh). But the chance of losing combat struggles is big, right? This is an awesome defender. Sure, commit with lots of terror and combat. I'll make sure to commit with this guy, lose combat and wound something from you.
The opponent has the choice to commit with enough and wound him, or commit with not enough and be wounded as well...
For me, this is a new auto-include. The 3 cost slot for ST decks is going to be a problem.
The fact he is immune to khopesh basically is good. Also, yes your opponent has to be afraid where commit characters because he can redirect if lose combat struggle.
Use "Small price to pay" to turn one enemy insane and wound the other!
That doesn't work though. Same as with Charles Dexter Ward. See the discussion here, with the ruling at the bottom: http://www.cardgamed...-–-basic-i-r777Nevermind, it's different as small price to pay has the wounding go second. Should work.
then force a stone calendar into the deck to remove fate tokens for infinite happyness
"then force a stone calendar into the deck to remove fate tokens for infinite happyness"
Stone Calender has now be Erattaed to only remove Story Success Tokens.
There is a rules thread that talks about this, but the summary is that you can target him, and trigger his ability, but if you redirect the wound to an opponent's character then you haven't paid the additional cost of committing, and thus don't get to go to the stories.
This guy seems overpowered to me. He's not loyal or steadfast so every serious deck is going to include a few ST characters now. Compare with Core Set Military Advisor who costs 4, has fewer icons, takes the wound (Toughness +2 vs August's Fated 3) and has to pay 2 to wound.
An ST splash is attractive due to powerhouse cards like this, but many deck archetypes just don't have room for it. At the last official Australian nationals this card was barely played and I expect a majority of the decks there qualified as serious.
The other problem is you could probably make the same claim about San Marco Basilica, Y'Golonac, Faceless Abductor, Dutch Courage, and so on. Can't splash them all. I don't have any tournament experience - I've only watched some of the Championship matches on YouTube - but personally I'd seek to do as little splashing as possible. I think a deck with a unified engine beats a toolbox deck 9 out of 10. That said, if my deck engine featured a lot of self-wounding (Pervasive Toxemia, Baka, etc.), I just might see if I could sneak 12-15 ST cards in there because August Lindquist and B. Ramsdale Brown would be a great fit with what I'm already trying to do.
This card is strong enough. I think add it to your deck is worth if you want to play positional warfare. His value will be maximized when committed alone. And... the combo combined with Pervasive Toxemia or Baka is too dirty...
Fair point, Yes. And Tom Caopr's Y-Train 3.0 winning deck https://www.fantasyf...all-of-cthulhu/ didn't have ST characters. I still don't like this guy though. Thematically inexplicable and devastating against wounders. .