Card Game DB
Sign In
Create Account
Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
7 Thomas Street
Submitted
fram
, Sep 29 2014 07:01 PM | Last updated Sep 29 2014 07:02 PM
7 Thomas StreetThe Fleur-de-Lys Building Type: Support Faction: Cthulhu Cost: 2 Game Text: Location. Players must pay 1 as an additional cost to play an event card. Each player may ignore this effect if he controls 2 or more Cultist characters. Flavor Text: Under the very shadow of the finest Georgian steeple in America, I found him at work in his rooms. Set: The Sleeper Below Number: 026 Illustrator: Tommy Arnold |
Call of Cthulhu: The Card Game, Living Card Game, the Living Card Game logo, Fantasy Flight Games, and the FFG logo are trademarks of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.
5 Comments
So "pay 1 as an additional cost" means that beyond whatever other costs the player is paying, including draining a domain for non-zero cost events, they're draining an additional domain to pay 1?
I do not believe that is correct.
The requirement is simply that you may pay an additional 1 - it doesn't matter where that additional 1 comes from. So, for example, if you have an event that costs 2, you could drain a single domain with 3 resources attached to pay the additional cost.
Neither of you are right; from the FAQ, section 2.15:
So it is. Makes me wish they'd chosen the phrasing "increase the cost," like on Lodge Defenses, which reads more plainly to me.