Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Baka
Submitted
Guest
, -- | Last updated --
![]() BakaType: Character Faction: Shub-Niggurath Cost: 3 Skill: 2 Icons: (T) (C) Game Text: Monster. Resilient. Response: After Baka enters play, wound another character you control and a character controlled by an opponent. Flavor Text: The baka was a corrupt spirit that had seized control of an animal. They were vicious, cruel, and uncontrollable. Set: The Thousand Young Number: 9 Illustrator: |
Call of Cthulhu: The Card Game, Living Card Game, the Living Card Game logo, Fantasy Flight Games, and the FFG logo are trademarks of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.
4 Comments
From http://www.cardgamed...ew-part-1-r1364
This might be a dumb question, but what if I don't have another character? Can I still wound my opponent's character? It doesn't use "then,..." in the language of the ability, so it seems like wounding my opponent's character is not dependent on me being able to wound one of my own. Can someone please confirm this?
I think it's all one effect, and the "and" suggests that both targets must be present. So, no other character, no Response.
I am pretty sure you can.
You haven't been told to choose characters, so there is no targeting failure. You noted the lack of a "then" so the multiple effect rule doesn't kick in, which leaves us with the cthulhu default of "do as much of it as you can".
This kind of wording almost always attracts FAQ errata, but without errata I think you are free to dodge your wound in any way you can (personally I think lindquist might be a fun choice here).