Dawnrise

Spammier style with spiders? In this deck you can only dupe that City of Soldiers effect with City of Spiders. Or what did you mean?

I assume he means to duplicate Negotiations with Spiders and leave the Soldiers plot for later to kill a 2 STR character.

Sloth's got the right of it. Negotiations can be duped with Spiders. I'm very capable of dropping 6-7 cards in a single turn, so having multiple Negotiations available allows me to constantly overload the board with my characters. Thinking about taking out TVB and replacing it with either Burning on the Sands, or A Game of Cyvasse. I never seem to need the Bannermen. Suggestions?

If you want to ditch 3xTVB you might add 1 Oberyn's Guile to the one you already have. Since you have so much gold, as it seems from what you say, you could easily afford it. In my Martell Lose deck I found the Guile to be a match winner, really.

At that point you might even want to drop House Messenger (it doesn't even help setup) in favor of something else, add 3x your new restricted choice and you're still gonna draw like crazy.

Maybe Burning on the Sand? What do you think?

I wanna keep the Messengers. Setup isn't a problem, but I don't wanna kill my draw entirely. I like the little bit of tuterage.. Might add 1 more Guile, but I honestly don't feel the need for it. 3 Messengers and the 1 extra a turn should suffice by and large.
Mind you, I'm only including one lose-to-win tech (Viper's Rage), I was considering taking Oberyn's Gule out altogether, so I don't lose challenges much. With the natural leaning towards excessive beefiness that Dayne has, people need to commit strength to challenges to win, so I can just let one go through and then blank, but as a habit I don't tend to lose many challenges.
Which is why I'm thinking of Game of Cyvasse over Burning on the Sand. With so many potentially high strength intrigue characters, I feel like I could use it to greater effect than I could negating a challenge when I don't tend to lose many.

I wanna keep the Messengers. Setup isn't a problem, but I don't wanna kill my draw entirely. I like the little bit of tuterage.. Might add 1 more Guile, but I honestly don't feel the need for it. 3 Messengers and the 1 extra a turn should suffice by and large.
Mind you, I'm only including one lose-to-win tech (Viper's Rage), I was considering taking Oberyn's Gule out altogether, so I don't lose challenges much. With the natural leaning towards excessive beefiness that Dayne has, people need to commit strength to challenges to win, so I can just let one go through and then blank, but as a habit I don't tend to lose many challenges.
Which is why I'm thinking of Game of Cyvasse over Burning on the Sand. With so many potentially high strength intrigue characters, I feel like I could use it to greater effect than I could negating a challenge when I don't tend to lose many.

I totally see the logic
The input about the Guile was in order to partially replace the draw from TVB, if you think you needed it, otherwise everything you said totally makes sense

I was really expecting this to have Ser Arthur Dayne (TWoW) and Dawn (TRS) based on the title. I probably like this better than I would have liked the Arthur.

How good has Shores of the Summer Sea (AToTT) been for you in this deck?