Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
HB Next Design Efficiency
Submitted by
MagisterWrigley
, Feb 09 2015 05:37 AM | Last updated Feb 17 2015 12:26 AM
Text File
BBCode
Copy the Decklist Below:
Close
Aggro
Identity
Order by: NameTypeCost
Total Cards: 0
Trying to take advantage of Next Design's quick start with a rush deck. I believe that unless you're trying to play aggressive and win early, the core set HB identity is better.
The strategy is straightforward - a mix of cheap ICE and expensive ICE that you target with Bioroid Efficiency Research or Oversight AI. If given the chance, try to score Accelerated Beta Test early.
Successful Demonstration fits with the rush economy. You should be able to pull this off with cheap ETR ICE. Ash supports your ability to aggressively score Agendas.
I played "Next Design" a few games and I feel: 20 Ice is to little to take full opportunity of this ID. I ran 23 Ice. But that shifted the deck to a more glacier style than rushing. Also I prefere "Beanstalk Royalties" over "Successfull Demonstration".
I still firmly believe that if you're playing glacier that the core set identify is better. That ID continues to help every turn and offsets the cost to install vertically. This ID gets you a fast start, but gets worse than the core set with every passing turn.
So far, this deck has been good. I'm still experimenting with different build variations. I haven't encountered a bad match up. Quetzal with E3 feedback would probably wreck this, but I haven't played against her yet. E3 in general is bad for this deck (and HB in general), but it doesn't seem to be a popular card at the moment.
A Shaper deck that builds their rig up and can start breaking your big ICE has been the biggest threat. All the more reason to rush while you have the advantage. Against such a deck, you should plan on paying to rez a Heimdall on your scoring server at some point.
I personally don't like having more than 20 ICE in my deck. 20 puts you at 40%, which means on average you will have 2 of 5 in your starting hand. Any hand with 2 ICE is one I am likely to keep. A mulligan into a hand with no ICE is disastrous. This also means you might keep hands that are otherwise undesirable. In such a scenario you are partially counting on drawing cards after your setup that help.
The biggest weakness of this deck is probably simple luck. Your starting hand makes a huge difference. Getting a 3 point agenda in your hand when you have the advantage helps a lot. Since you're rushing, you want to score 3 agendas to win before the runner can counter. Having to score 4 2-point agendas is more difficult. There is the added benefit of scoring an early Priority Requisition letting you rez a big ICE without drawbacks.
2nd weakness is lack of surprise factor. You don't have many tricks to punish the runner for running. They generally know what they have to deal with before they run. I would like to use Ichi 1.0 for that surprise punishment, but most runners won't blind run without clicks left against HB.
5 Comments
Looks like a pretty clean build. Have you played many games with it yet? What are some of its strengths and weaknesses so far?
I played "Next Design" a few games and I feel: 20 Ice is to little to take full opportunity of this ID. I ran 23 Ice. But that shifted the deck to a more glacier style than rushing. Also I prefere "Beanstalk Royalties" over "Successfull Demonstration".
A Shaper deck that builds their rig up and can start breaking your big ICE has been the biggest threat. All the more reason to rush while you have the advantage. Against such a deck, you should plan on paying to rez a Heimdall on your scoring server at some point.
I personally don't like having more than 20 ICE in my deck. 20 puts you at 40%, which means on average you will have 2 of 5 in your starting hand. Any hand with 2 ICE is one I am likely to keep. A mulligan into a hand with no ICE is disastrous. This also means you might keep hands that are otherwise undesirable. In such a scenario you are partially counting on drawing cards after your setup that help.
2nd weakness is lack of surprise factor. You don't have many tricks to punish the runner for running. They generally know what they have to deal with before they run. I would like to use Ichi 1.0 for that surprise punishment, but most runners won't blind run without clicks left against HB.