Jump to content

Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
* * * - -

Scheherazade



Scheherazade

Scheherazade


Type: Program: Daemon
Cost: 0 Memory Units: 0
Faction: Runner Anarch
Faction Cost: 1
Scheherazade can host any number of programs.
Whenever you install a program on Scheherazade, gain 1 [Credits].
Strength: -
Set: Second Thoughts Number: 022 Quantity: 3
Illustrator: Tim Durning
Recent Decks Using This Card:
Karma Chameleon
Noise
Weekend At Duggar's
Property is theft
noise1
Want to build a deck using this card? Check out the Android: Netrunner deckbuilder!


29 Comments

Very good in a memory heavy shaper deck that can install programs out of their heap a lot.

Edit - I just noticed the hosted programs still count towards the memory limit. Eh, I suppose it's alright if you're installing a few Djinn's, Test Run stuff, or programs that aren't going to stay on it for long, but I'm not seeing much use for this.
Not helping with MU and a Rototurret away from loosing all your programs? Pass.
Perfect in caissa decks actually... Install your chess piece on it for a free credit, then use its click ability to move it to an ICE. Caissa is my s***
Yeah, at first I thought this was good because I thought it gave you infinite memory. That would be pretty sweet and would create a pretty cool deck archetype where you have tons of programs, but are completely paranoid of program trashing. But, sadly, that is not the case and this card is largely boring and won't see a ton of play.
This card will get tons of play in Caissa decks... A credit refund for each one installed, yes please... That makes playing a pawn actually profitable. But outside of that I don't see much use.
It's pretty much made for Caissa decks. If they are going to be competitive remains to be seen though.
€: I love the art though.
There is some debate as to whether most Caissa can legally move from Scheherazade or Djinn onto the Corp's ICE, given the way the hosting requirements are written on the Caissa cards.

My own reading of the card is that Caissa and Scheherazade interact without any problems, but that's only my own reading.
    • Zouavez likes this
Yeah, I agree with that interpretation.
I see no reason you can not move cassia from this to ICE... Love that people are rating down this and bishop, I think peoples minds will change once someone wrecks with a cassia deck, just my opinion though. I am determined to make them work.
Pawn works with this, however Bishop does not. Bishop states that if already hosted it can only bounce around between ice on centrals and remotes. Since it is on neither, it can't move at all. The same goes for Rook.

As written, the only Caissa that can move off of Scheherazde is Pawn. The others may or may not be errata'd or faq'd to say that they can. As written, it's a no-go.
Photo
CommissarFeesh
Nov 15 2013 09:34 AM
Re-read Bishop. It says if hosted on a central it can only move to a remote, and if hosted on a remote can only move to a central. If hosted on Scheherazade, neither condition is true and Bishop can move anywhere.

Rook, on the other hand, is totally screwed unless we get an errata.
Agree with Commissar on the first part.

However I also think that Rook works with this card, the way I read the text; "Click]: Host Rook on a piece of ice not hosting a Caïssa. If already hosted, Rook can be hosted only on ice protecting this server or on ice in the same position (counting from the innermost spot) protecting another server."

So you install on Scheherazade with a click like any other program. Rooks click ability then says to host rook on a piece of ice not hosting caissa (no problems yet). Then is says if already hosted, rook can be hosted only on ice protecting this server... (because Scheherazade is not a server, it is a program, this text means nothing and you revert back to the previous sentence which says host rook on a piece of ice.)

Agree with Commissar on the first part.

However I also think that Rook works with this card, the way I read the text; "Click]: Host Rook on a piece of ice not hosting a Caïssa. If already hosted, Rook can be hosted only on ice protecting this server or on ice in the same position (counting from the innermost spot) protecting another server."

So you install on Scheherazade with a click like any other program. Rooks click ability then says to host rook on a piece of ice not hosting caissa (no problems yet). Then is says if already hosted, rook can be hosted only on ice protecting this server... (because Scheherazade is not a server, it is a program, this text means nothing and you revert back to the previous sentence which says host rook on a piece of ice.)


Nope, Rook will definitely not work with Scheherazade. "If hosted" is the key word here. Rook is definitely being hosted on Schegerazade therefore there is no way to move rook to satisfy its "if hosted" condition. So Rook is stuck if it's hosted on anything other then ice on a server.

I see no reason you can not move cassia from this to ICE... Love that people are rating down this and bishop, I think peoples minds will change once someone wrecks with a cassia deck, just my opinion though. I am determined to make them work.


People are rating this and bishop down because they are not very good. Some people are capable of making accurate card judgements. Nobody is going to stop you from making your crappy Cassia deck, though. It might get better when Deep Red comes out....maybe.
Caissa decks ("pure" builds, as in no viruses and at least a moderate use of Caissas, not just one or two) will probably only be competitive if King and Queen end up being good and less support-focused. I don't see myself using Scheherazade in a Whizzard deck using Bishop as it's only Caissa. However, that doesn't mean either card is bad; Bishop is good (in the right builds) and Scheherazade doesn't have its full complement of cards which synergise with it yet.

BTW, I just realized that Anarch's two main themes (viruses and Caissa) each get their own Daemon program. That's pretty cool.
We need a ruling on the Caissia interaction before we conclude, because I'm really not certain how Bishop would work.
It says 'if hosted' so it's hosted,
but then it say "can only be hosted on an ice protecting a central server IF bishop is on...a remote server" and vice versa.
Does the "only...if" mean that can't host it on a central server unless it's current host is a remote (meaning it can't move off the daemon) or does it mean that it's only resticted in where it can move if already on a server and therefore can more from the daemon to any ice.

I do agree with LeoLancer that the pure Caissa deck will depend on King and Queen. just by the names those should be the 'big' programs.

As for Sheharazade itself, I wonder if it might be good with the cheap trashable programs like Cresentus.
Photo
darkelf2099
Nov 20 2013 07:53 AM
Thinking of using this with parasites and/or imps. Maybe even Gorman Drips
Photo
CommissarFeesh
Nov 20 2013 09:52 AM

Thinking of using this with parasites and/or imps. Maybe even Gorman Drips


You can't host Parasite on Scheherezade, it can ONLY be installed on rezzed ICE. Other temporary programs like Imp and Gorman Drip are fine though. Also consider Crescentus, False Echo and Deus Ex.
I don't get why people are so terrified of someone trashing this. Are your programs getting trashed that often? Except for aggressive secretary the only way for the corp to trash programs right now is through sentry ice. So all the runner has to do is not face check until they have a killer out (a pretty good rule of thumb anyways), and now every runner can be Kate (kinda).
Photo
KarzinomEngel
Nov 20 2013 07:26 PM
I think this will work great in a Sahasrara/Virus Mill deck, getting a credit for each virus i install DataMedium/Imp/Nerve agent is quite nasty.
Ok, it's even more vulnerabe than my Djin. But i prefer already a 'Djin-Ception' anyway...
Mh, installing programs on Djinn hosted on a Sahasrara doesnt pay me 1 cred I guess :ph34r:
Photo
CommissarFeesh
Nov 22 2013 11:52 AM

Mh, installing programs on Djinn hosted on a Sahasrara doesnt pay me 1 cred I guess :ph34r:


Correct. Mainly because Sahasrara can't host Djinn (or any cards ;) )

However, it ALSO won't work if your Djinn is on Scheherezade, as you install to one or the other. So you have to choose between making a credit or saving the MU.
    • Meadbeard likes this
Exile should have some use for Scheherazade I guess
Too bad the "everything on Scheherazade" archetype will not last, at least not in Professor decks... Once Power shutdown becomes available, it's an unavoidable (unlike Rototurret, which may be planned for, and Secretary, which may conceivably be avoided) way to trash Scheherazade for the corp.
The only way to dodge that is to havec SMC or Pawn ready to trash, and an unused SMC ties up 2 MU, which is really to much.
Photo
Shuffletown
Dec 16 2013 07:39 PM

Too bad the "everything on Scheherazade" archetype will not last, at least not in Professor decks... Once Power shutdown becomes available, it's an unavoidable (unlike Rototurret, which may be planned for, and Secretary, which may conceivably be avoided) way to trash Scheherazade for the corp.
The only way to dodge that is to havec SMC or Pawn ready to trash, and an unused SMC ties up 2 MU, which is really to much

Not really an issue for Caïssa, however, since you will presumably be running multiples of Pawn and Bishop.

Netrunner is a TM of R. Talsorian Games, Inc. Android is TM & ©2012 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Netrunner is licensed by Wizards of the Coast LLC. ©2012 Wizards.