Card Game DB
Sign In
Create Account
Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Nazzy Landa
Submitted by
MotoBuzzsawMF
, Aug 10 2015 06:33 PM | Last updated Aug 12 2015 01:38 PM
2 Comments
So... even forcing gimmicks to breaking point, we've got a 60% hit rate on Landa activations with an average 2.56 indirect damage when it hits?
Well, if nothing else, you've nicely demonstrated for us why Landa is a bad card!
Tried a build myself, leaving off the Nobz and adding on Rokkit Launchas and some other stuff, as well as going mono ork, ended up with 70% hit rate but lower average damage, but at least managed to get the Enraged Orks and Snakebite Thugs back in. All in all though, I think its just not worth it. Even as a fun deck, it looks sub-Throne-of-Vainglory.
The thought experiment is a good one though!
LOL The designers of Conquest just want to keep the greenskins down. LOL