Card Game DB
Sign In
Create Account
Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Smasha w chaos
Submitted by
Etaywah
, Mar 22 2016 05:19 PM | Last updated Apr 12 2016 06:15 PM
- MotoBuzzsawMF and retoxidi like this
2 Comments
Personally if I'm facing Orks with a command superior deck (which many will be compared to this) I would focus on resources and not bother as much with cards unless I know I can play them out. What does the deck do against this strategy?
If they are denying themselves of cards, then you're ahead. That means they have paid for a card in hand to fulfil a purpose - command or combat - and in this case command, and then they have actively chosen to deny themselves of the rewards generated from that investment in order to prevent the repercussion of Smasha. So translation: You're ahead.
Orks shine in a pure-combat situation with few tricks, so having no mercy and them having few shields in hand puts the favor of the battle in your hands - at least that's what I've found. I've had opponents not draw 4, 5, and 6 cards before in fear of a single smashsa. Every card is an option; so whether its a unit or a shield or a drop pod assault, cards are the most valuable resource in the game, and you're either denying them that resource, or you're punishing them for utilizing that resource.