Card Game DB
Sign In
Create Account
Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Highgarden Cavaliers
Submitted
Darksbane
, Aug 18 2010 06:04 PM | Last updated Mar 01 2011 06:15 PM
Highgarden CavaliersType: Character House: Lannister Cost: 5 Strength: 5 Icons: Military,Intrigue Game Text: Army. House Tyrell. No attachments except Siege. Crest: War Number: 71 Set: EB Quantity: 3 Illustrator: Ben Zweifel |
|
| Recent Decks: |
Power Lann1 The Real Power Behind the Throne The Golden Armies Lanny- Rawr Intrique |
2 Comments
Can someone please explain why you would choose Highgarden Cavaliers over House Clegane Brigands or King's Landing Guard. I understand the latter of the two does not have the Warcrest symbol and the first can allow attachments but it doesn't seem worth it for 5 gold. Both the Brigands and the Guard have excellent responses, cost one less gold and, like I said, one has the Warcrest Symbol and the other has no attachments.
Isn't it obvious? Lannister conquest Baratheon decks that run the mega potent House Tyrell synergies along with the super reliable less cards at command abilities! Similarly Tywin Lannister (TK) centric decks running HoD:The Inn at the Crossroad's and a bunch of clansman to **** out gold would 100% run this card over the other two.
This is one of those cards in the CCG/LCG crossover cycle. It was probably designed with the CCG and not the cards you mentioned in mind. Every card has it's deck.