Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
The King's Ground
Submitted
Darksbane
, Aug 19 2010 01:34 AM | Last updated Feb 25 2011 05:53 PM
![]() The King's GroundType: Attachment House: Baratheon Cost:1 Game Text: Condition. House Baratheon only. Attach to a location you control. Attached location gains Vigilant. Number: 6 Set: IG Quantity: 3 Illustrator: Tysen Johnson |
|
Recent Decks: |
STAGS ON A BOAT! Baratheon Rush Bara knights (WIP) baratheon black sails melee Bara HoD Asshai Fury |
11 Comments
Smuggler's Cove (KotStorm). Bad condition treat. I think this card is one of many which are not included in decks due to limited space. Attachments generally have not many slots in decks and card on it's own does nothing. Effect too weak to build deck around it or at least give it some support.
What if the challenge in which Rob participates involves Deadly, and that kills a character - can you set it off 3 times?
I've been wondering if I could try to make a silly Shagga Deck with this sort of theme.
So your first example works. The Berserker's kill allows you to trigger the House's response. The when you win the mil challenge with Robb, the House stands for Vigilant and Robb's response allows you to trigger the House.
If deadly is also involved then the House will trigger for either deadly or Robb's effect, but will already be knelt so you can't trigger it for the other one.
Thanks - I totally forgot that I was only winning one challenge in my example - so if I went into the military attack with THOBAW standing - would I then be able to set it off with both Deadly, and then Robb?
I guess what I'm worried about is if there is no chance for Vigilant to happen between Deadly and the Response, though now that I think about it - would it go:
Challenge won -> Process keywords/claim (inc. Vigilant, Deadly) -> Responses?
If so - I think it's time to make a deck to test this puppy out!
Simplified flow would be:
Challenge won
Vigilant and deadly go off(first player picks order)
Regular responses. Either kneel the House as response to deadly's kill, and then Robb's response(at which point the House is already knelt). Or use Robb's response, and then kneel the House for either Deadly or Robb, but the House will be knelt for the one you didn't pick.
That might actually open up some choices as deadly is a lot easier to get than Robb (though he could always be replaced with other challenge-based kill effects from Baratheon cards).
I'll still see how it goes