Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Eve Campaign
Submitted
Darksbane
, May 01 2013 01:36 AM | Last updated May 01 2013 01:36 AM
![]() |
Eve CampaignType: Asset: Advertisement Cost: 5 Faction: Corp Haas-Bioroid Faction Cost: 3 Place 16 [Credits] from the bank on Eve Campaign when it is rezzed. When there are no credits left on Eve Campaign, trash it. When your turn begins, take 2 [Credits] from Eve Campaign. Trash: Set: Humanity's Shadow Number: 092 Quantity: 3 Illustrator: Sara K. Diesel |
Recent Decks Using This Card: NEXT Foundry Kill/Program Trash Round Table Next - Grail Foundry Next/Grail Breaking Baad |
|
Want to build a deck using this card? Check out the Android: Netrunner deckbuilder! |
Netrunner is a TM of R. Talsorian Games, Inc. Android is TM & ©2012 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Netrunner is licensed by Wizards of the Coast LLC. ©2012 Wizards.
9 Comments
That said, the only thing I like about this card is the trash costs, while it picks up in the long term economy, I think I still prefer to use Adonis/Marked Accounts/PAD campaign for my economy, unless I desperately can't spare the 3xfaction influence on MA.
Speaking of influence, this one feels very wrong, should have been 1-2 max.
Adonis.....t1:.-1...t2:...2.t3:..5..t4:..8x..t5:..8...t6:..8..t7:..8
Marked.....t1:..1c..t2:...2.t3:..3..t4:..4c.t5:..5...t6:..6..t7:..7
PAD.........t1:.-1...t2:...0.t3:..1..t4:..2...t5:..3...t6:..4..t7:..5
Eve.........t1:..-3..t2:..-1.t3:..1..t4:..3...t5:..5...t6:..7..t7:..11x
Periods are to preserve spacing, c denotes that a click was spent, x denotes that the asset was trashed this turn.
Looking at it like this, Eve looks comparable to PAD campaign in the first 4 turns after rez, and looks surprisingly similar to Marked Accounts,
even if you discount the requirement to load it up with clicks. Adonis remains the best of the bunch, trumping all other assets in terms of RoR with ease, up to two turns after it goes dry.
In the long term, it seems that eve is a sound investment, after all. While I still think the entry cost is too prohibitive, unless you intend to bait the runner into losing clicks and money by setting it up on an unprotected remote, which is a fair plan in my books.
I think it can have place, but it doesn't fit the current HB asset gameplan.
- She gets pulled from my hand and trashed. Would you play a card that says "When this card is accessed, the runner loses 5c?" I would.
- I install her (and isn't that a double entendre considering HB's product line) into an unguarded remote. Runner runs on a remote, maybe loses 5c, but at the very least spent time running something I didn't care about.
- I install her, rez her, and she gets trashed. There's no real upside to this, unless she's bait to keep the runner off the server I care about.
- I install her, rez her, and get enough credits off her to make back my investment. So, Yahtzee.
So the way I look at it, out of 4 possible outcomes, 3 of them are good for me and the one that isn't can still be part of a Xanatos Gambit. I love this card. Maybe not in every deck, but very solid.