Card Game DB
Sign In
Create Account
Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Condemned
Submitted
Darksbane
, Feb 18 2012 06:44 AM | Last updated Feb 18 2012 06:44 AM
CondemnedType: Attachment House: Neutral Cost:2 Game Text: Condition. Attached character loses all Traits and immunities. If you win dominance, kill attached character. Number: 96 Set: TBC Quantity: 3 Illustrator: Timo Karhula |
|
| Recent Decks: |
Stark: Wolves & Arya v3 (Final) Baratheon: Power & Fury (Final Version 60 Cards) Iron Throne Decoy Robert Weird attachment hand Knights of the Throne (HoD) |
9 Comments
That is a really interesting question, my guess would be that if snakeskin veil was attached first then condemned couldn't be attached in the first place because according to the FAQ "A card cannot be chosen as a target of effects to which it is immune." However, if condemned were attached first then I don't really know. Either the same thing would happen and condemned would be knocked off as soon as the Snakeskin Veil immunity was created but before condemned would remove it, or the first player would decide which passive would resolve first.
Actually in the second case in which condemned was attached first snakeskin veil couldn't be attached because the character wouldn't have the Sandsnake trait. So basically neither of them could be attached if the other one were already on.
Who has to win Dominace in this case? The Player who owns the Attachment or the Player with attached character?
Also, can the character gain any Traits after Condemned has been attached?
I think Poisoned Coin (THoBaW) would be a better choice afterall: cheaper, Weapon Trait instead of Condition, draw effect and the character gets killed instantaneously after being raised back up due to some effect.
2) Condemned takes away single instance of every trait, so if you gave Lord trait to a printed Lord, he would still have that trait.