Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Manning the City Walls
Submitted
Darksbane
, Jun 29 2012 05:01 AM | Last updated Jun 21 2014 05:41 AM
- Valterus likes this
![]() Manning the City WallsType: Plot House: Neutral Income:1 Initiative: 2 Claim: 2 Game Text: City. When revealed, if you have no City plots in your used pile, put an in-House Army character into play from your hand. Number: 60 Set: CD Quantity: 3 Illustrator: Dimitri Bielak |
|
Recent Decks: |
Buying Armies dotrhaki v2 Income denial Greyjoy Saves (no agenda) Stark siege |
39 Comments
It might even replace Respect of the Old Gods (LoW) in some Stark decks.
If only it didn't have the No-City plots stipulation as many Targ burn decks tend to run At the Gates (GotC) to grab Advisor to the Crown (QoD) to get 2 Influence on the board right away. So, you'd have to choose between the two... having a 2 Claim plot with a free Army... might just be enough if you're running enough Influence in general.
This and Robb Stark (KotS) just seems so wrong!
Oh well. Then I can go for Laughing Storm + Val combo instead.
Seems to me this plot + Knights of the Storm (KotStorm) is a good combo, especially given the fact more than likely you won't be first player anyway.
That's all that matters.