Jump to content

Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
* * * * *

Orphan of the Greenblood



Orphan of the Greenblood

Orphan of the Greenblood



Type: Character House: Martell
Cost: 0 Strength: 0 Icons:
Game Text:
Ally.
Any Phase: Discard Orphan of the Greenblood from play (cannot be saved) to choose 1 character. Until the end of the phase, that character loses a Military, an Intrigue, and a Power icon.
Number: 15 Set: PotS
Quantity: 2 Illustrator: Jonathan Standing
Recent Decks: Martel Quentyn Melee
The Only Way is Orphan - Rayleigh, Essex (UK) Regional Winner 17/05/2014
Icons? What icons?
Wild Martells
A Viper in Oldtown (Melee)


18 Comments

If
Enslaved (THoBaW) is played on this card can the owner trigger the Orphan ability before control changes?
Photo
emptyrepublic
Oct 10 2012 01:31 PM
Unfortunately no as there is no "Any Phase" period during the player framework action in which the attachment is being played. I'd argue though that playing enslaved on an Orphan is silly given how expensive that attachment is.
Photo
slothgodfather
Oct 10 2012 01:55 PM
Lanni should be able to easily afford it, and it's a good way of getting read of something that might shut down a key character for a turn. Yes it's not normally ideal, but I can see it being the best choice at the time.
So if it had the text "Response" rather than "Any Phase" you would be able to discard it?
If that "Response" was a response to your opponent playing an attachment or to the Orphan changing control, then theoretically yes.
Photo
slothgodfather
Oct 10 2012 05:59 PM
Actually, even in that theory, the reponse would have to be a save/cancel to the change of control in the first place.
Steps as follows:
1. Initiate effect to take control
2. cancels/saves? - in our initial response theory we have none
3. control change resolves successfully
4. passives
5. responses

There is no moribund status for changing control, so after step 3 completes the Orphan is no longer your character and you still wouldn't be able to trigger the response on there even if the play restrictions where met.
Sloth is always usually right about these things (how's that for definitive!) so I defer to him here.
Photo
slothgodfather
Oct 11 2012 12:18 AM
The "usually" part is the most accurate part of that statement! :ph34r:
Love it, thanks!
If a challenge is already in progress, and I use this ability on a participant character, that character still attacks and counts right?
Photo
emptyrepublic
May 06 2013 08:36 AM

If a challenge is already in progress, and I use this ability on a participant character, that character still attacks and counts right?


Correct, the moment a character is participating in a challenge (regardless of how it got there) it's STR counts regardless of what icons are or are not present; unless there is a follow up effect that says it doesn't.
    • GRAAK and ComeHonor like this
If Someone cancels the ability of this card. Does it get discarded still?
Yes, discarding is the cost.

When a card says "do x to y" then the x happens every time, and a cancel would only prevent the y, along with any " y, then z..." effects.

So that means canceling a Varymir Sixskins effect can be beneficial, To Be... events will still stand a character even if canceled, etc...
A Situation that occured yesterday: the martell Player used the orphan to blank my Dragon. On my turn i wanted to give my Dragon an intrigue Symbol with "qarth". The bara Player was like "doesn't work because for the Rest of the Phase your Dragon lost all of it's Icons."
What would be correct?
A.) it can't gain an Icon because of the orphan.
B.) it gains an Icon because the effect of the orphan already resolved (that would be My guess).
B would be correct, the effect was already resolved.

Edit: Now I'm not sure that this is the correct answer after looking at what Ktom said
http://community.fan...the-greenblood/
Well, what i read is that B is nevertheless correct :/
Hmm.
Since the Orphan's effect lasts until the end of the phase, and it removes one instance of each icon, it would also remove the intrigue icon granted by Qarth. The exception to this would be if you had the new Viserion (AHA) in play, since Qarth would give him a second instance of an Intrigue icon.

From the FAQ, Pg 17:
"Most effects in A Game of Thrones resolve immediately after being triggered, but some effects last for a set period of time, or even indefinitely. Effects that last for longer than a single action are considered lasting effects. Both actions and passive abilities can be lasting effects. "
+
"Multiple Lasting Effects
Even if not triggered at the same time, multiple Lasting Effects may affect the
same card at the same time. For example: a character without the Power icon is affected by two lasting effects. One (such as Slander) removes a Power icon from the character, and one (such as Lordship) adds the Power icon to that character. In this example the two lasting effects cancel each other, and the character is left unchanged. The order in which the lasting effects take place is irrelevant: the net sum result of all lasting effects is applied to the character (the net sum of –1 Power icon and +1 Power icon is 0, thus the character remains unchanged). A character can never have more than one icon of a specified kind.
"


One caveat: "Slander" is not a card....FAQ the FAQ!!
    • NikolaP likes this
Okay thank you. That's good to know :-)