Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Lady Valarian
Submitted
Guest
, -- | Last updated --
![]() |
♦ Lady ValarianType: Unit Cost: 4 Force Icons: 3 Icons: 2 ![]() ![]() Faction: Dark Scum and Villainy Character. Reaction: After an opponent’s conflict phase ends, deal 1 damage to a target ready unit. If the Balance of the Force is with the dark side, deal 2 damage instead. A competitor to Jabba the Hutt’s criminal enterprises on Tatooine, Lady Valarian schemed about how to take over the Hutt’s operation. Health: 3 Resources Generated: 1 Block Number: 216 - 2 of 6 Set: Redemption and Return Number: 1050 Illustrator: Brynn Metheney |
1 Bounty Hunting Scum have rated this card!
|
|
Other Cards in Block 216 | |
---|---|
Recent Decks Using This Card: |
Star Wars and all associated elements are © 2011 Lucasfilm Ltd. & TM. All rights reserved. Fantasy Flight Games, Fantasy Flight Supply, and the FFG logo are trademarks of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.
9 Comments
Ugly scum Leia?
That's racist.
Everyone's a little bit racist.
To make a more serious contribution to the conversation, I like Leia's icon spread more. Lady Valarian's guns will let her take out an attacker, but I like Leia's ability to tactics down a potential blocker so you can go on the offensive next turn. Fortunately, Scum have plenty of tactics in other sets.
With Vicious Counterattack, Slave Trade seems like a natural choice to run with this set.
Or Tat Crash, though Jawas are easier to get rid of, and you may run into resource issues.
It's perfect set to be x1 in a scum deck. All the latest scum sets are good x1.
I am intrigued...why do these sets mix so well with this one because of V Counterattack?
Vicious Counterattack requires you to focus 2 scum units - so you need lots of (preferably, cheap) units so you can pay that cost. Tat Crash and Slave Trade have lots of cheap scum units - and with tactics, too!
Ok... I thought it might have been something more profound