Jump to content

Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Subzero Defenses



Subzero Defenses

Subzero Defenses


Type: Enhancement
Cost: 1
Force Icons: 1
Faction: Light Neutral
Condition.
Enhance your play area.
Destroy the first enemy unit to strike against a friendly Hoth objective each turn, after its strike resolves.
Block Number: 39 - 6 of 6
Set: The Desolation of Hoth Number: 0189
Illustrator: Cristi Balanescu
* * * * *   3 Galactic Citizens have rated this card!
Other Cards in Block 39
Recent Decks Using This Card:


17 Comments

If a player attacks a Hoth objective with two units, chooses to resolve unit 1 first and unit 1 deals no blast damage, is it considered "to strike against" the Hoth objective and thus trigger the ability of Subzero Defenses?

If a player attacks a Hoth objective with two units, chooses to resolve unit 1 first and unit 1 deals no blast damage, is it considered "to strike against" the Hoth objective and thus trigger the ability of Subzero Defenses?


Yes it just has to strike, doesn't have to damage the objective or even be able to damage it.

Yes it just has to strike, doesn't have to damage the objective or even be able to damage it.


Thanks...I was thinking it "Strikes" if it's in the battle...triggering Subzero Defenses...even if it doesn't do any damage to the objective.
The online card setup for Star Wars LCG is a bit confusing at times. If you'd looked at the other Subzero Defenses available for the same objective on this site, you would have found the answer without having to ask (because I had to ask earlier too) :P

Maybe it would be a good idea to find a solution to this. Maybe merging all instances of the same cards (fate cards, I'm looking at you) into a single page (and displaying all objectives in which they appear on them).
    • JTDimino likes this
Is condition the same as forced reaction in this case?

Is condition the same as forced reaction in this case?


Condition is a trait. Just like Force User or Vehicle.

Forced Reaction is an ability.

Subzero Defenses text is a constant that is always "on".
Photo
jcmcclellan
Jun 30 2014 08:51 AM

Could be a dumb question but came up in an online match:

 

If the LS player has all 3 Hoth Objectives, does it kill the first unit to strike in three separate engagements? My understanding was it only killed the first unit to unit, as separate engagements would constitute the 2nd and 3rd strikes respectively.

 

Thanks!

@jcmclellan. I am not the authority on rules but I agree with you on this. It should only kill the first one to strike any hoth objective, not the first unit to strike each. Otherwise this would be totally undercosted IMO.

no, it specifically states it only kills the first unit to strike against a hoth objective EACH TURN.   If your opponent argued this card and he was on octgn, just put him on ignore, best to avoid people like this, they will argue that the sky isn't blue and make your time on octgn very unenjoyable.

    • xXDarthBladeXx likes this
doesn't 'against' here refer to the objective itself? Intuition says that otherwise ot would be worded just 'strike ( during engagement )'. Resolving combat icons do target?
@theduke26 @ jcmcclellan, your interpretation is most convincing on this. Each Turn would be written 'each engagement' otherwise

doesn't 'against' here refer to the objective itself? Intuition says that otherwise ot would be worded just 'strike ( during engagement )'. Resolving combat icons do target?


The unit simply needs to strike while engaging a Hoth objective, it could have zero icons at all and it would still die.

The unit simply needs to strike while engaging a Hoth objective, it could have zero icons at all and it would still die.

Is there a ruling confirmed for this? If so the wording is quite counter-intuitive

Photo
TwoShedsJackson
Jul 08 2014 11:12 AM

Is there a ruling confirmed for this? If so the wording is quite counter-intuitive

 

Answered by Nate French here: http://www.cardgamed...nly/#entry29226.

 

I have a questions about Subzero Defense.

Do the first unit sacrifice need to have star blast icon or just any first unit that is focused to strike?

Nate French

The first enemy unit that is focused to strike in an engagement that was declared against a Hoth objective. It doesn't matter what icons the unit has
Nate French
Senior LCG Designer
Fantasy Flight Games

Is there a ruling confirmed for this? If so the wording is quite counter-intuitive

I don't see how it is counter intuitive. The first unit that strikes. Pretty simple really. 

    • xXDarthBladeXx likes this
I can see why people feel the wording is counter intuitive because it's saying when a unit strikes against a friendly hoth objective, however, it's really not, you just need to realize that it doesn't matter if you have blast damage or not, your units still strike the objective, they just aren't doing any damage to it.
Photo
CataractCowboy
Oct 28 2016 04:12 PM

Star Wars and all associated elements are © 2011 Lucasfilm Ltd. & TM. All rights reserved. Fantasy Flight Games, Fantasy Flight Supply, and the FFG logo are trademarks of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.