Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Volantis Inn
Submitted
Darksbane
, Jul 26 2012 09:56 PM | Last updated Aug 24 2012 02:59 PM
|
|
| Recent Decks: |
1st Place - Ottawa Regional -Lannister_TLV Lannister Nobles Melee A Golden Crown v3 deck lanni intrigue kneel PbtT Control |














Sign In
Create Account
(Back)



Volantis Inn









15 Comments
NuFenix
Jul 26 2012 11:08 PM
Happening in the Standing phase is strange, as I can't think of any card that happens in that phase as a player action, compared to the usual Responses to cards standing in this phase. But kneeling something like Lannisport Councilor (RotO), Lannisport Moneylender (LotR) or Lannisport Weaponsmith (Core) as the gold will still be generated.
The Shagga side of me sees Ser Jaime Lannister (LotR) working especially well, as he will stand at the start of the Taxation phase anyway, so all I really did was kneel a location to kneel one of their characters without attachments. Whilst No Attachments is helpful against burn, it makes it easier for Lannister to kneel them.
theduke26
Jul 27 2012 02:37 AM
NuFenix
Jul 27 2012 12:53 PM
Kneel a maester with this, stand the location, then kneel another character.
Rave
Jul 27 2012 06:41 PM
Atticus
Jul 27 2012 07:40 PM
Enrico
Jul 28 2012 08:25 PM
NuFenix
Jul 29 2012 11:27 AM
Zatoichi
Jul 30 2012 08:54 PM
Laxen
Jul 31 2012 06:44 AM
Bomb
Jul 31 2012 08:35 PM
Laxen
Aug 01 2012 06:47 AM
And yes It's of course also good with a not-so-useful character that can be "wasted" on it - but it's much more fun to use a character that can do it without losing out on anything.
erocklawell
Aug 06 2012 04:55 PM
Ixamos
Aug 09 2012 10:23 PM
jackmerridew
Aug 20 2012 03:54 PM
Skelton
Aug 23 2012 06:50 AM