Card Game DB
Sign In
Create Account
Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Lead by Example
Submitted
Darksbane
, Oct 24 2012 04:14 PM | Last updated Oct 24 2012 04:14 PM
Lead by ExampleType: Plot House: Neutral Income:3 Initiative: 4 Claim: 1 Game Text: Players must declare 2 or more characters to attack or defend in a challenge. Number: 120 Set: ARotD Quantity: 3 Illustrator: Charles Urbach |
|
| Recent Decks: |
martel - hod scourge v2 Quest To The East martel HoD - Scourge vol 2.0 Lannister Control - Baelnor Dumb Ways to Die |
6 Comments
Oops! We're playing a Melee and I revealed Battle of Oxcross (PotS).
This plot hurts Black Sails.
Black Sails is already inherently less efficient, since you have to declare an attacker, and *then* a naval attacker. That's what the fleets are for, to enable you to trigger your agenda with a net one attacker. With this plot out, if they want a card from their hold, that's *three* characters they have to throw at you.
I was just thinking this same thing today. Great minds, and all that. The difference was that I was going to keep it to myself lol.