View New Content

Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Javascript Disabled Detected

You currently have javascript disabled. Several functions may not work. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality.

Burning on the Sand

Submitted Darksbane , Aug 10 2010 04:30 AM | Last updated Jun 10 2013 03:25 AM

Burning on the Sand Type: Event House: Martell Cost: Game Text: Restricted Response: If an opponent would win a challenge against you, cancel the determination of the challenge winner. No one wins the challenge. Number: 112 Set: RotO Quantity: 3 Illustrator: Dimitri Bielak
Recent Decks:	Martel Quentyn Melee The Tully's of Dorne Bloodthirst 3rd UK nats after swiss (5W1L) Bloodthirst - No Influence - FAQ 5.0 Martell Knights

13 Comments

slothgodfather

Jul 20 2012 05:23 PM

Does this cancel the power-gain from Unopposed challenges also?

n00bcommander

Jul 20 2012 05:57 PM

Yes it does. If you do not win the challenge you cannot claim unopposed

Dakhlan

Oct 22 2012 10:57 PM

Does 'No one wins the challenge' means that, if I am the defender, my characters with vengeful stand?

emptyrepublic

Oct 23 2012 03:45 AM

No, you didn't lose the challenge.

- slothgodfather and BSuarez like this

samuellinde

Nov 08 2012 02:39 PM

Are passive abilities still triggered, i.e. deadly would still be in effect? It's only the determination of the challenge winner that is cancelled, not the challenge itself?

Laxen

Nov 08 2012 03:59 PM

The challenge is not ended, no. Only the fact who wins it. Deadly etc would still have effect since it doesn't care who won - only how many characters with deadly each player had (but not Renown for example, since no player won, or Vengeful or Vigilant).

samuellinde

Nov 10 2012 08:16 AM

Thanks, that's how I've played it as well â€“ just wanted to confirm that.

DubiousYak

Nov 23 2012 09:17 PM

So if somebody plays this, then their opponent plays Misinformation - what happens? Does the Misinformation cause a winner to be decided?

theCrow

Nov 23 2012 09:40 PM

Notice that these are cancels, so my bet is that once the first of those two events is played the save/cancel response window closes and the other player doesn't get to play his event. I mean, you can't cancel same thing twice if the first cancel was successful, cause there is nothing to cancel.

Enrico

Nov 23 2012 10:08 PM

Missinformation could not be played in that case, as nobody would be winning the challenge after this event is played (and misinformation requires it).

emptyrepublic

Nov 24 2012 05:42 AM

What's worth noting is that playing misinformation allows for this event to be used afterwards since it can also be played in the same save/cancel response window and the Martell player would be losing the challenging at that point.

Sligui

Mar 10 2014 05:52 PM

Hey everyone

I was just wondering at what point in the framework action window should this card be played?

After step 1. Determine the winner of the challenge?

Or before it? (after defenders are declared, during the player action window)

Thanks!

NikolaP

Mar 10 2014 07:25 PM

Hey everyone I was just wondering at what point in the framework action window should this card be played?

After step 1. Determine the winner of the challenge?

Or before it? (after defenders are declared, during the player action window)

Thanks!

1. Determine the winner of the challenge (Framework event initiates)
2. Burning on the Sand (Save/cancel responses to framework event)

So, after the determination of the winner initiates, and before it resolves, you play it as a cancel.

- Sligui and Avatar like this

IPB skin by IPBFocus

Community Forum Software by IP.Board

Burning on the Sand

Burning on the Sand

13 Comments

Sign In