Jump to content

Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
* * * * *

The Red Viper


  • brunopontes likes this

The Red Viper

Unique The Red Viper



Type: Character House: Martell
Cost: 5 Strength: 3 Icons: Military,Intrigue, Power
Game Text:
Lord.
Renown. Immune to events and character abilities.
The Red Viper does not kneel to attack an opponent who controls more characters than you.
Crest: Noble
Number: 1 Set: PotS
Quantity: 2 Illustrator: Patrick McEvoy
Recent Decks: Noble
Martel Quentyn Melee
Bloodthirst 3rd UK nats after swiss (5W1L)
Stark Noble Conquest Martell
The Only Way is Orphan - Rayleigh, Essex (UK) Regional Winner 17/05/2014


22 Comments

Photo
hollowbandit
Jun 04 2012 03:16 AM
This is one of my favorite cards. I think this is still the best Viper out there. Wish it had better art though....
Photo
emptyrepublic
Jun 04 2012 04:05 AM
The immune to events and character abilities is perhaps the most powerful aspect to him. He's expensive but on more than one occasion he alone has won the game for me.
Photo
jackmerridew
Jun 04 2012 02:54 PM
is there a single better character card?

Lord trait, noble crest, tricon with renown immunity and a non kneeling to attack effect, this with
Lost Oasis (AToT) and Poisoned Knife (ASoSilence) is a destructive force

or alchemist shop with venemous blade for surprise deadly
    • hollowbandit likes this
In my mind Meera is still better. She hard counters quite a few of the problem cards in the game right now. I tend to be more of a utility guy though.
Photo
jackmerridew
Jun 04 2012 08:27 PM
well i'll definitly give you that meera is up there but meera alone cant get you 7 power in 1 turn and utility or not that makes this one of the most dangerous cards to hit the board
Photo
hollowbandit
Jun 04 2012 09:05 PM
I agree with jackmerridew. I can't think of any better characters out there. This guy just seems to win games for me.
Well that's the thing. He's really good at winning games, but he's terrible at controlling the table. There are a ton of ways to deal with him too, people generally don't run them though. There aren't really any answers to Meera. Except immunity I guess? Its a bit of an apples and oranges thing, so a bit hard to compare them in terms of power.
Is he restricted? Someone said he is. I am just wondering whether the site has been updated or not.
Photo
emptyrepublic
Apr 10 2013 06:59 AM

Is he restricted? Someone said he is. I am just wondering whether the site has been updated or not.


As of the 4.0 FAQ he's restricted only for Melee. Not in Joust.
are keywords considered abilities?
Photo
LorasTyrell
Aug 28 2013 11:10 AM

are keywords considered abilities?

Nope, keywords are keywords :D
    • Pdovisk likes this
He is immune to events, but can he be saved by events? Further more, is he still immune to events in the dead pile?
Nope, he cannot be saved by events and he is not immune to anything while he is in a dead pile. Unless specifically stated on a card, keywords are only active while the card is "in play" (though a keyword like "ambush" is a good example of an exception to this). However, you could use something like Narrow Escape (KotStorm) on him, since he would already be in your dead pile.
maybe a dumb question but: Can he be saved by discarding a dupe? Or betTer said: Can you even dupe him? Wouldn't he be immune to the duplication?

maybe a dumb question but: Can he be saved by discarding a dupe? Or betTer said: Can you even dupe him? Wouldn't he be immune to the duplication?

He can be saved. From FAQ - A card with immunity is not immune to its
own abilities.
Also, duplicate is not considered a character, so - he can be duped.

Is he immune to the mono Icon dudes? I hear that he is but I don't get that. True? or not true?

Photo
slothgodfather
Sep 08 2014 09:11 PM

Yes, since he is immune to character abilities, he is immune to the mono-con guys. He is also immune to Willas Tyrell. It doesn't have to be a triggered ability to be considered a character ability.  

 

(3.7) Card Abilities 
"Card abilities" (i.e. "Character ability," "Location ability," or "Attachment ability") refers to anything in a card's text box, except for traits, keywords, and flavor text.

So if I have TRV in play AND Stalwart Shield (both in my control), does SS still "protect" TRV, or does TRV's immunity prevent SS from protecting him??  I've heard/seen it both ways, but still confused.  I see both points of view/arguments...

 

SS reads: Noble characters you control cannot lose icons, have their STR reduced, or be knelt by card effects. 

SS is character and TRV is immune to char abilities.

The thing a lot of people have trouble with is that "immune to character abilities" means that the card ignores the effects of all character abilities. Even the beneficial ones.

Thanks for the responses.

 

For me, at least, the issue wasn't negative/beneficial character abilities, but more an issue of "is SS affecting TRV, or is SS preventing the card effect which is burning/kneeling/icon stripping TRV." 

 

For instance:  I totally get it that when Ser Boros Blount comes out of shadows, TRV cannot gain the +1 str benefit.  This is a character ability which would directly affect TRV with a +1 str buff.

 

What about a case where an opponent triggers the Black Cells and targets TRV.  That's legit of course since TRV is not immune to location abilities.  However, if I play He Calls it Thinking to cancel the Black Cells, that's ok too, since HCiT is targeting The Black Cells, and not TRV (who is immune to events - even beneficial ones).

 

So I suppose my confusion/uncertainty was:  "Is SS affecting TRV in a similar way to Boros Blount, or is SS affecting the game effect, in a similar manner to HCiT, which is being mean to my beloved TRV?"

 

Another comparison:  if I were to give TRV the Nights Watch trait (say, via "First Ranger" attachment) and I had Jon Snow in play, I realize TRV would not gain "immune to events" from Jon Snow, since Jon Snow specifically says that a Night's Watch characters gain "immune to events".  However, SS doesn't actually give nobles gained text or abilities that prevent them from being molested.  Rather, he himself prevents the effect.  (Yes, I realize TRV already has "immune to events" on his own, so maybe not a great example, but still valid).

 

Probably just grasping at straws and reading way too much into it (and probably ignoring lots of rules/FAQ enties)   :)

Photo
MagnusLothar
May 11 2015 01:06 PM

For me, TRV's immunities don't present much of an issue (although it would be great to be able to use Choosing the Spear on him).  At least he's safe from the likes of Coldhands and characters with targeted kill effects such as the new Dany.  Being able to attach HCIT can put him out of reach of City of Soldiers for a time too.  I'd say overall his immunities present a far greater headache for opponents.

 

Opponents' attachments are the biggest minefield...