Card Game DB
Sign In
Create Account
Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Rhoynar Emissary
Submitted
Darksbane
, Aug 20 2012 03:40 PM | Last updated Aug 20 2012 03:40 PM
Rhoynar EmissaryType: Character House: Martell Cost: 2 Strength: 2 Icons: Power Game Text: Ally. Challenges: Kneel Rhoynar Emissary to choose a character. If that character is not declared as a participant in the next challenge this phase for which it is eligble, discard it from play. Any opponent may kneel 2 influence to cancel this effect. Number: 71 Set: AHM Quantity: 3 Illustrator: Chase Toole |
|
| Recent Decks: |
Quest To The East Martell Ally First Martell deck Learning Maesters... v2 Martell deadly maesters |
7 Comments
Against houses that don't run much influence, (which on the whole is everyone but Targ and Martell) I could see this being of some use. I would imagine you would need to combine this with something where they wouldn't want to participate, such as attacking them with a Deadly character.
That is kind of my point though isn't it? Spelling mistakes shouldn't really happen at this level of professionalism, nor at the consistancy it appears to be. Broken cards I understand, using "to" instead of "too" I understand. But not running a spellcheck to notice "eligble" isn't right - that I don't understand.
The card works, replacing eligible with "Able" would make the wording grammatically incorrect.