Jump to content

Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Search Articles

* * * * *

2C1C- Episode 172

2C1C 2 Champs and a Chump Podcast Kennon Gearhalt Thepandathatrides

Episode 172- Cast: Will, Darryl, and Kyle. GenCon 2014 preview. Music: Josh .Woodward, Celestial Aeon Project, and Manuel Gertrudix

Also:
Follow us on Facebook.
Follow us on Twitter.
I hear Google+ is a thing.
Email us!
  • scantrell24 likes this


18 Comments

Really like the show as always but is Will recording this underwater or something? I can hardly hear what he is saying.

Because no room can hold the awesomeness of 2C1C, it is now recorded in space.

 

Besides this, thanks for your houses ranking. I am looking forward, how good your predictions are, and which houses will be at the top in the end of Gencon. Have fun there.

Photo
ScionMattly
Aug 08 2014 12:49 PM

Really appreciate a melee overview - it gives me a really good perspective on the difference in competitive Melee and table in a basement Melee. It's odd, since we've never played to consider second except out of pride.

Guys, this episode turned out pretty good...well done.

Enjoyed the episode as usual, but the sound quality continues to be an issue.
Edit for accidental double post

In listening to this I thought to myself "well, the discussion is good but I completely disagree with putting Greyjoy anywhere near 1st, and certainly not above Stark". So I decided to do some data collection on the Battle of Blackwater, the biggest tournament since the FAQ.

 

Caveats to this data:

- It was immediately after the FAQ and people hadn't necessarily had time to test new builds.

- Prize in the North was not legal for this tournament.

- European Meta =/= North American Meta, although differences are slowly receding.

- There is obviously not necessarily enough data from one tournament, even a large one like this, to draw widescale conclusions.

 

With that all said, here is the data I gathered:

 

BARATHEON:
Total Participants - 11
Participants in the Cut - 0
Top 3 Participants - 18th, 21st, 22nd
Average Placement - 47.73
 
GREYJOY:
Total Participants - 7
Participants in the Cut - 2
Top 3 Participants - 5th, 11th, 23rd
Average Placement - 32.71
 
LANNISTER:
Total Participants - 21
Participants in the Cut - 1
Top 3 Participants - 3rd, 19th, 30th
Average Placement - 46.43
 
MARTELL:
Total Participants - 10
Participants in the Cut - 2
Top 3 Participants - 4th, 8th, 24th
Average Placement - 44.20
 
STARK:
Total Participants - 16
Participants in the Cut - 5
Top 3 Participants - 1st, 2nd, 6th
Average Placement - 34.13
 
TARGARYEN:
Total Participants - 15
Participants in the Cut - 6
Top 3 Participants - 7th, 9th, 12th
Average Placement - 34.87
 
So we can see a clear top three of Greyjoy, Stark and Targaryen, all of whom place on average about 10 places higher (out of 80) than Baratheon, Lannister and Martell. There is then a fair amount of scope for debate among the top three. Greyjoy has the best average placement, but off the fewest data points and has the lowest qualification ratio of the top three. Targaryen has the best qualification ratio, but of the 6 Targ decks to make the cut 5 lost in the top 16 and the 6th lost in the top 8. Stark doesn't have the best average placement or the best cut-making ratio, but did win the tournament (in an all-Stark final), with its 3rd best-performing deck placing higher than Targaryen's best and only one place lower than Greyjoy's best.
 
In conclusion I think that Greyjoy are a house I must underrate. It is worth pointing to the low participation count though - with the Old Way being broken up days before, perhaps people who intended to play the house changed to another house (maybe to a stable build like a Lanni No Agenda, that they didn't have time to test, resulting in that house's poor ranking?).
 
It's also worth pointing out that the placement in the cut stats maybe aren't worth much, given that of the 17 people who finished 4-2, 8 made the cut and 9 didn't based on strength of schedule. Can we really say the handful of Bara decks that went 4-2 but didn't make the cut are proof the house is in trouble compared to a house like Martell, when both had very similar average placement and Martell also didn't have a deck manage better than 4-2 (it just so happened that 2 of the Martell 4-2 decks made the cut on strength of schedule compared to 0 of the Bara decks). Then you get into the 'grey area' stuff like one of those Martell decks that made the cut being Martatheon...
 
I may have over-analysed this. Hopefully people can glean something of use though, at least.
 
 
EDIT: On deck names, I always name my tournament decks, I just never bother trying to push them into the mainstream. Credit for Beachballs being brought up should probably go to sparrowhawk, who brought it up a couple of times in the thread about what consitutes NPE in the forums.
    • Kennon, darknoj, istaril and 2 others like this

Soooo..... the biggest thing that I get out of this is that my house rankings were almost exactly correct based on that data?

I have started to like running a Targaryen deck with shadows kingsguard in melee. Several renown characters in there of which all are no attachments except weapons so Mel's Favor simply cannot touch em. Shadows keep them quite safe as well and that shadow Barristan really is a beast. Couple all this with plenty of stands and the likes of To Be a Dragon/Ambush from the Plains you have even ways of fastly securing winning power without your opponents realizing that you could actually go for the win.

 

I still don't see these guys often enough, but the new neutral brotherhood guys should see more play in melee. Gedry is really good as is Lady of the Leaves since the requirement is that someone has more power than you do.

My two cents won't be worth much but I will throw them in anyway
Joust
1.stark
2.greyjoy(give people time)
3.lannister
4.targaryen
5.Martell
6.baratheon
Photo
scantrell24
Aug 09 2014 12:07 PM
Won't we all look silly when DC shows up to GenCon with Bara Maesters and takes half the cut.

Ah, man, I can't believe I forgot about Gendry! He's probably an auto include in every melee deck!

I'm going to say

1. Targ

2. Stark

3. GJ

4. Martell

5. Lanny

6. Neutral

7. Baratheon

 

Just kidding,but I really feel Bara is still very very weak!

Photo
scantrell24
Aug 11 2014 01:16 AM

I'm going to say

1. Targ

2. Stark

3. GJ

4. Martell

5. Lanny

6. Neutral

7. Baratheon

 

Just kidding,but I really feel Bara is still very very weak!

 

That's spot-on.

I feel bara has the best closers in the game, but they are usually better runed outside their house. Example: Fat Bob out of targ with fire made flesh!

It sounds like an EQ issue to me. You need a drastic cut in the low mids. There probably will be some EQ tweaks needed after that, but it's where I would start trying to correct the recording.

I'm going to say

1. Targ

2. Stark

3. GJ

4. Martell

5. Lanny

6. Neutral

7. Baratheon

 

Just kidding,but I really feel Bara is still very very weak!

 

So we got 0 Targ in the top 8, only 1 Stark in the top 8 (and none in the top 4), the other four houses all featuring with one deck each. How do you feel your predictions went?

Listened to all my casts late this week as I have been busy, but great episode again guys well done, but lookout for your competition bringing in Buzz the Ringer Podcaster.

 

PS great job Panda on your GenCon placing