Jump to content

Welcome to Card Game DB
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Search Articles

* * * * *

The White Book S7E04- 228

Podcast The White Book Kennon Pulseglazer Tcmmy Supercuts

This week, Will, Aaron, Tommy, and special guest Seth talk about the new Stark box preview as well as get a Red Saturday tournament report and talk state of the meta with Aaron.
Music by Spinozar

Discord Chat Server
  • fauxintel likes this


22 Comments

Thanks for the prop! One of these days, we'll be able to make it to the cast. :P

Photo
PulseGlazer
Dec 04 2015 11:50 AM
So, do you all agree or disagree with me on the Meta?
Great episode of the Seth Low Show this week guys.

I liked the meta stuff. I've played a couple of your decks Aaron and they've been great - I totally agree that Lannister are one of the strongest houses, and I'd probably agree they are best (and I'm loving them, either way).

Nice to be propped but you aren't going to mentioned in the theme.
    • PulseGlazer and fauxintel like this
Also, I totally meant to apologize for the sound quality this week. Had an issue with the recording software that affected things.
Photo
PulseGlazer
Dec 04 2015 02:13 PM
I'm going to make my own theme! Come at me!

And just to listeners in general, if you want a deck or help with a deck, feel free to message me.
Photo
PulseGlazer
Dec 04 2015 03:01 PM
Oh also, here's the decklist that is discussed: http://thronesdb.com...-lanny-rose-1.0

TR link to follow.

So, do you all agree or disagree with me on the Meta?

 

I'm gonna copy my thoughts on the RS meta from the BtW thread. More once I listen to the cast this afternoon.

 

 

Seth: if you wanted a read of the meta you should have taken the trip.  ;)

 

But for you here's my read of things from RS. There was a solid amount of GJ floating around in the middle ranks of the tournament. It seems that some variant of the Kraken (either fealty or otherwise) is the "gear check" of the Taking the Black meta - either you can reliably beat it or you're chances of making into the top 16, much less the cut, is low.

 

There was a lot more Lannister on RS than there was at Worlds and that Lannister did quite well (2 prime house in the cut, 1 banner, and obviously Aaron won). The question is: is RS at all representive of the broader meta in this regard? A lot of New Yorkers play Lannister (we were known as a Targ favored meta in 1.0, the Lions may become NYC sigil for 2.0). However, my belief is that Lannister is much stronger than its showing at Worlds would suggest. Obviously we've had only 2 high level tournments for 2.0 in North America, so things will be developing. But I do think Lanni is the house to watch.

 

The other house to watch is Tyrell. The impact of Sam's win at World's, to me at least, was not proving that Martell is viable as a prime house but, rather, showing that Tyrell is strong - as both a banner and a prime house. Aaron's victory here gives us more evidence there. Same with Noj's strong showing. I think we will be seeing a lot of the Rose as we move into early 2016. Particulary if your median player continues to drift towards GJ. Tyrell has a lot of answers to the Kraken's tricks (including Alex's favs Left and Right).

 

Of course, y'all are free to take this with a grain of salt. I'd love to hear Jon's read and I'm sure we'll get Aarons in a few days.

 
Photo
PulseGlazer
Dec 04 2015 03:22 PM
2 Lanny banners on the cut - Dave and Jon.
Photo
PulseGlazer
Dec 04 2015 03:23 PM
Oh and 3 main house Lanny- Wolf, Dragon, and, of course, Rose.
Photo
PulseGlazer
Dec 04 2015 03:28 PM
Oh whoops, youre right on the number of Tyrell.

Oh and 3 main house Lanny- Wolf, Dragon, and, of course, Rose.

 

Right, my memory failed me. ;)

The discussion of Varys is exactly why I say Valar does not need to come back. People need to adapt, and the problem that Valar solves should be addressed by more interesting card design and more skill-based deckbuilding.

Photo
PulseGlazer
Dec 04 2015 07:55 PM

The discussion of Varys is exactly why I say Valar does not need to come back. People need to adapt, and the problem that Valar solves should be addressed by more interesting card design and more skill-based deckbuilding.

 

I'm to the point where I largely agree, but, still, since we are getting Valar per Nate, it doesn't really matter.

He said it so long ago...I remain hopeful that Danny Schaefer may have won the argument.

 

More than anything I hate the meta-mindset that puts a "but when Valar comes back" asterisk on every aspect of the game. Nobody really knows, they can't decide, we can't grow our knowledge base for card valuation and deckbuilding while we're waiting for the other shoe to drop.

 

I may sell out of the game if Valar comes back evergreen. The thing I liked most about playtesting the core set was the feeling that unique characters were playable and were meant to be impactful...that you were getting your money's worth out of that 7g, and they were going to have a real part to play in the story every match tells.

 

That moment where they were talking about "I don't want to play my Tywin unless I can dupe him up," man, I don't want to play that game. It's easily the thing I hated most about first edition. Least Nedly thing EVER. Sure, anyone can die, but they die by being poisoned, by being executed, killed in battle, killed by sorcery, killed by treachery. Right now that's the game we have. There is nothing in GRRM's books that says "rocks fall everyone dies start over."

I'm to the point where I largely agree, but, still, since we are getting Valar per Nate, it doesn't really matter.

 

We are getting a card named Valar Morghulis. Not sure if it will be the Valar as we knew it in first ed.

That moment where they were talking about "I don't want to play my Tywin unless I can dupe him up," man, I don't want to play that game. It's easily the thing I hated most about first edition. Least Nedly thing EVER. Sure, anyone can die, but they die by being poisoned, by being executed, killed in battle, killed by sorcery, killed by treachery. Right now that's the game we have. There is nothing in GRRM's books that says "rocks fall everyone dies start over."

 

This is exactly the game I want to play, to be honest. I think the game is in a great over all place but right now we have few "catch-up" tricks or ways to punish overextension. Wildfire is not doing it. Varys is half way measure, the strengths and weaknesses of which Seth, Aaron, Will, and Tommy highlight at length. You have to draw him, he's expensive, he can be difficult to play if you are truly behind, etc. etc. 

 

Not being able to play Tywin without set-up, without a way to protect him (be it with Bodyguard, a dupe, or some other means), would be utterly fantastic. It rewards planning and holding back, reading your opponent, and rather than just rewarding those who draw better.

 

As for theme, while few characters just die because "rocks fall out of the sky" they do die or get punished when they expose themselves without planning or preparation.  Just look at what happened when Ned traveled through King's Landing largely exposed, in the first book. This let Jaime attack him and kill most of his men. 

 

But overall, I am exhausted with this debate. We don't have Valar right now and mourn it or not, endlessly debating it does no one any good. 

    • SeanBecker, PulseGlazer and ojimijam like this
Photo
PulseGlazer
Dec 04 2015 11:42 PM

 

 

But overall, I am exhausted with this debate. We don't have Valar right now and mourn it or not, endlessly debating it does no one any good. 

 

Co-signed.

    • fauxintel likes this

Danger Zone !!!!

 

Also good stuff from Seth

great episode !

    • PulseGlazer and fauxintel like this
Photo
YellowJacket
Dec 05 2015 10:31 AM

Greetings again y'all. Great podcast as always :)

    • PulseGlazer likes this
Photo
PulseGlazer
Dec 05 2015 02:48 PM

Here, have a full Tournament Report: http://www.whitebook...eport/#comments

    • BlueHill likes this

Great podcast, nice to hear more about Red Saturday tournament. Gongrats to Aaron for winning it, the deck looks something I would like try in a tournament.  

    • fauxintel likes this

As for theme, while few characters just die because "rocks fall out of the sky" they do die or get punished when they expose themselves without planning or preparation.  Just look at what happened when Ned traveled through King's Landing largely exposed, in the first book. This let Jaime attack him and kill most of his men. 

 

No, they don't just die for no reason. You listed an instance where an overexposed and underprotected play got punished. You know what that was? A goddamned military challenge. And the game has ways to punish unprotected characters already: Claim, Kill Events, kneel, bounce, but those are all produced by the play of the game. Valar is an effect that doesn't come out of the books, it's a blunt instrument with no basis in story or context.